Connected
Ask

Saved answers

Answers people kept. An answer turns stale when the data it cites changes; the reason and date are shown.
LineAllLine ALine BPlant-wideTopicAllProcessQualityStateAllStill currentStale

Saved

4 of 6 · grouped by line
Line A · 1
Saved answers, Line A
QuestionTopicSaved byConfidenceState
Line A viscosity driftViscosity rose 38 mPa·s over 9 batches with end-of-hold torque; a small agitator increase is modelled to bring it back.QualityQuality head A.20 OctModelled2430 to 2560 mPa·s after the changeStill current
Line B · 3
Saved answers, Line B
QuestionTopicSaved byConfidenceState
Tool T3 cycle change, valueParts per shift rose 2.6% after the cycle change; the value at the plant's prices is on the owner's Home.ProcessOwner A.19 OctMeasured1.9 to 3.3% parts per shiftStill current
Hold pressure 720 bar, did it hold?Scrap fell 0.6 points and was still holding at the last check.ProcessPlant head A.14 OctMeasured0.3 to 0.9 points less scrapStill current
Light parts on cavity 2Part weight on cavity 2 recovered after Process raised hold pressure.QualityQuality head A.7 OctMeasured48.0 to 48.4 gStill current

Went stale

Why, and since when
Will a shorter hold work on Grade A-12? · since 17 OctModel of the mixer recalibrated to a-2.2 and its fit is no longer accepted; the safety filter has since withheld this change.Lot 3307 outlook · since 19 OctA correction was sent to Process after this was saved, and lab results for the lot are still missing.

By line and topic

Counts
LineTopicSavedStale
Line AProcess11
Line AQuality21
Line BProcess20
Line BQuality10

Evidence the thread behind each answer cites

Evidence
IdLabelClaimSaved answerProof
EV-B-2101MeasuredParts per shift rose 2.6%, interval 1.9 to 3.3%.Tool T3 cycle change, valueCycle time 33.2 s, Line B
EV-A-1180MeasuredViscosity rose 38 mPa·s over the last 9 batches.Line A viscosity driftSource record
EV-A-1188MeasuredEnd-of-hold torque rose with it on the same batches.Line A viscosity driftLot 3307 viscosity save
EV-A-1191ModelledA small agitator speed increase would bring it back inside the band.Line A viscosity driftSource record
EV-B-2101MeasuredParts per shift rose 2.6%, interval 1.9 to 3.3%.Hold pressure 720 bar, did it hold?Cycle time 33.2 s, Line B
EV-B-2214MeasuredTwo proposals accepted on Line B, one waiting on Line A.Light parts on cavity 2Source record

Tool T3 cycle change, value

Owner A. · Line B · Process
Still current

Parts per shift rose 2.6% after the cycle change; the value at the plant's prices is on the owner's Home.

MeasuredBand 1.9 to 3.3% parts per shift
Cycle time 33.2 s, Line BShorter cycle on Tool T3Cycle time 34.1 to 33.2 s
Answer as saved, from the thread
What did the Tool T3 cycle change earn last month?
MeasuredWeakest of 1 cited claim
Why this confidence
Method
Each claim carries the label of its evidence; the answer takes the weakest. Uncited numbers are removed before an answer is shown.
Evidence
EV-B-2101
  1. Parts per shift rose 2.6%, interval 1.9 to 3.3%.EV-B-2101Measured
Proof recordCycle time 33.2 s, Line BOpen evidence
Cycle time 33.2 s, Line B
ImprovedR4 VerifiedMeasured
Effect Parts per shift +2.6 %, interval 1.9 to 3.3 %.
Why this confidence
Method
Proof record
Diagnostics
All passed
Open in AskSaved 19 Oct