Connected
Ask

Saved answers

Answers people kept. An answer turns stale when the data it cites changes; the reason and date are shown.
LineAllLine ALine BPlant-wideTopicAllProcessQualityStateAllStill currentStale

Saved

0 of 6 · grouped by line

No saved answers match these filters.

Went stale

Why, and since when
Will a shorter hold work on Grade A-12? · since 17 OctModel of the mixer recalibrated to a-2.2 and its fit is no longer accepted; the safety filter has since withheld this change.Lot 3307 outlook · since 19 OctA correction was sent to Process after this was saved, and lab results for the lot are still missing.

By line and topic

Counts
LineTopicSavedStale
Line AProcess11
Line AQuality21
Line BProcess20
Line BQuality10

Evidence the thread behind each answer cites

Nothing here yet

Evidence: no rows in this view.

Tool T3 cycle change, value

Owner A. · Line B · Process
Still current

Parts per shift rose 2.6% after the cycle change; the value at the plant's prices is on the owner's Home.

MeasuredBand 1.9 to 3.3% parts per shift
Cycle time 33.2 s, Line BShorter cycle on Tool T3Cycle time 34.1 to 33.2 s
Answer as saved, from the thread
What did the Tool T3 cycle change earn last month?
MeasuredWeakest of 1 cited claim
Why this confidence
Method
Each claim carries the label of its evidence; the answer takes the weakest. Uncited numbers are removed before an answer is shown.
Evidence
EV-B-2101
  1. Parts per shift rose 2.6%, interval 1.9 to 3.3%.EV-B-2101Measured
Proof recordCycle time 33.2 s, Line BOpen evidence
Cycle time 33.2 s, Line B
ImprovedR4 VerifiedMeasured
Effect Parts per shift +2.6 %, interval 1.9 to 3.3 %.
Why this confidence
Method
Proof record
Diagnostics
All passed
Open in AskSaved 19 Oct