Connected
Ask

Saved answers

Answers people kept. An answer turns stale when the data it cites changes; the reason and date are shown.

Saved

Line B · 2
Saved answers, Line B
QuestionTopicSaved byConfidenceState
Tool T3 cycle change, valueParts per shift rose 2.6% after the cycle change; the value at the plant's prices is on the owner's Home.ProcessOwner A.19 OctMeasured1.9 to 3.3% parts per shiftStill current
Hold pressure 720 bar, did it hold?Scrap fell 0.6 points and was still holding at the last check.ProcessPlant head A.14 OctMeasured0.3 to 0.9 points less scrapStill current

Evidence the thread behind each answer cites

Evidence
IdLabelClaimSaved answerProof
EV-B-2101MeasuredParts per shift rose 2.6%, interval 1.9 to 3.3%.Tool T3 cycle change, valueCycle time 33.2 s, Line B
EV-B-2101MeasuredParts per shift rose 2.6%, interval 1.9 to 3.3%.Hold pressure 720 bar, did it hold?Cycle time 33.2 s, Line B

Tool T3 cycle change, value

Still current

Parts per shift rose 2.6% after the cycle change; the value at the plant's prices is on the owner's Home.

MeasuredBand 1.9 to 3.3% parts per shift
Answer as saved, from the thread
What did the Tool T3 cycle change earn last month?
MeasuredWeakest of 1 cited claim
Why this confidence
Method
Each claim carries the label of its evidence; the answer takes the weakest. Uncited numbers are removed before an answer is shown.
Evidence
EV-B-2101
  1. Parts per shift rose 2.6%, interval 1.9 to 3.3%.EV-B-2101Measured
Proof recordCycle time 33.2 s, Line BOpen evidence
Cycle time 33.2 s, Line B
ImprovedR4 VerifiedMeasured
Effect Parts per shift +2.6 %, interval 1.9 to 3.3 %.
Why this confidence
Method
Proof record
Diagnostics
All passed
Open in AskSaved 19 Oct