Ask

Saved answers

Answers people kept. An answer turns stale when the data it cites changes; the reason and date are shown.

Saved

3 of 6 · grouped by line

Line B · 3

Saved answers, Line B
Question	Topic	Saved by	Confidence	State
Tool T3 cycle change, valueParts per shift rose 2.6% after the cycle change; the value at the plant's prices is on the owner's Home.	Process	Owner A.19 Oct	Measured1.9 to 3.3% parts per shift	Still current
Hold pressure 720 bar, did it hold?Scrap fell 0.6 points and was still holding at the last check.	Process	Plant head A.14 Oct	Measured0.3 to 0.9 points less scrap	Still current
Light parts on cavity 2Part weight on cavity 2 recovered after Process raised hold pressure.	Quality	Quality head A.7 Oct	Measured48.0 to 48.4 g	Still current

Why, and since when

Counts
Line	Topic	Saved	Stale
Line A	Process	1	1
Line A	Quality	2	1
Line B	Process	2	0
Line B	Quality	1	0

Evidence
Id	Label	Claim	Saved answer	Proof
EV-B-2101	Measured	Parts per shift rose 2.6%, interval 1.9 to 3.3%.	Tool T3 cycle change, value	Cycle time 33.2 s, Line B
EV-B-2101	Measured	Parts per shift rose 2.6%, interval 1.9 to 3.3%.	Hold pressure 720 bar, did it hold?	Cycle time 33.2 s, Line B
EV-B-2214	Measured	Two proposals accepted on Line B, one waiting on Line A.	Light parts on cavity 2	Source record

Shift lead A. · Line A · Quality

Stale since 19 Oct

Stale since 19 Oct (24 h ago)A correction was sent to Process after this was saved, and lab results for the lot are still missing.

Predicted viscosity sat near the upper spec; the band was unanchored at the time.

EstimatedBand 2540 to 2630 mPa·s

Answer as saved, from the thread

Will lot 3307 meet spec?

AbstainedI cannot say yet. The lab result for lot 3307 is missing, so the viscosity band is unanchored.

Open in AskSaved 18 Oct