Ask

Saved answers

Answers people kept. An answer turns stale when the data it cites changes; the reason and date are shown.

Saved

2 of 6 · grouped by line

Line A · 1

Saved answers, Line A
Question	Topic	Saved by	Confidence	State
Line A viscosity driftViscosity rose 38 mPa·s over 9 batches with end-of-hold torque; a small agitator increase is modelled to bring it back.	Quality	Quality head A.20 Oct	Modelled2430 to 2560 mPa·s after the change	Still current

Line B · 1

Saved answers, Line B
Question	Topic	Saved by	Confidence	State
Light parts on cavity 2Part weight on cavity 2 recovered after Process raised hold pressure.	Quality	Quality head A.7 Oct	Measured48.0 to 48.4 g	Still current

Why, and since when

Counts
Line	Topic	Saved	Stale
Line A	Process	1	1
Line A	Quality	2	1
Line B	Process	2	0
Line B	Quality	1	0

Evidence
Id	Label	Claim	Saved answer	Proof
EV-A-1180	Measured	Viscosity rose 38 mPa·s over the last 9 batches.	Line A viscosity drift	Source record
EV-A-1188	Measured	End-of-hold torque rose with it on the same batches.	Line A viscosity drift	Lot 3307 viscosity save
EV-A-1191	Modelled	A small agitator speed increase would bring it back inside the band.	Line A viscosity drift	Source record
EV-B-2214	Measured	Two proposals accepted on Line B, one waiting on Line A.	Light parts on cavity 2	Source record

Shift lead A. · Line A · Quality

Stale since 19 Oct

Stale since 19 Oct (24 h ago)A correction was sent to Process after this was saved, and lab results for the lot are still missing.

Predicted viscosity sat near the upper spec; the band was unanchored at the time.

EstimatedBand 2540 to 2630 mPa·s

Answer as saved, from the thread

Will lot 3307 meet spec?

AbstainedI cannot say yet. The lab result for lot 3307 is missing, so the viscosity band is unanchored.

Open in AskSaved 18 Oct